Quantcast
Channel: Swimming News
Viewing all 81303 articles
Browse latest View live

Competitor Coach of the Month: Anthony Nesty, Florida

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

Competitor Coach of the Month is a recurring SwimSwam feature shedding light on a U.S.-based coach who has risen above the competition. As with any item of recognition, Competitor Coach of the Month is a subjective exercise meant to highlight one coach whose work holds noteworthy context – perhaps a coach who was clearly in the limelight, or one whose work fell through the cracks a bit more among other stories. If your favorite coach wasn’t selected, feel free to respectfully recognize them in our comment section.

In the month of February, two different Florida Gator men shattered American and NCAA records in the 500 free and 1650 free – giving University of Florida swimmers ownership of four out of five national men’s freestyle records in short course yards.

Coach Anthony Nesty led the Florida men to an 8th consecutive SEC title, a streak that reaches back to when Nesty was an assistant under the retired Gregg Troy. Nesty’s accomplishments the past two years have been particularly impressive, given how much elite talent has escaped the Florida roster, whether through graduation (Caeleb Dressel, Jan Switkowski, Mark Szaranek) or transfer (Maxime Rooney, Kacper Stokowski, Erge Gezmis) or medical issues (Trey Freeman, Michael Taylor).

Most notably, Florida sophomore Bobby Finke shattered the American and NCAA records in the 1650, going an absurd 14:12.08. Meanwhile fellow sophomore Kieran Smith smashed American and NCAA records in the 500 free in 4:06.32. He also hit a nation-leading 1:30.11 in the 200 free.

When you add in Dressel’s 50 free and 100 free, Florida now owns American and NCAA records in 4 of 5 events.

 

About Competitor Swim

Since 1960, Competitor Swim® has been the leader in the production of racing lanes and other swim products for competitions around the world. Competitor lane lines have been used in countless NCAA Championships, as well as 10 of the past 13 Olympic Games. Molded and assembled using U.S. – made components, Competitor lane lines are durable, easy to set up and are sold through distributors and dealers worldwide.

Competitor Swim is a SwimSwam partner. 

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Competitor Coach of the Month: Anthony Nesty, Florida


NCAA Establishes Coronavirus Advisory Panel to Guide Outbreak Response

$
0
0

By Torrey Hart on SwimSwam

The NCAA has established a panel of medical professionals and student-athlete liaisons to guide the organization’s response to the coronavirus (COVD-19) outbreak, it announced Tuesday.

“The NCAA has established a COVID-19 advisory panel of leading medical, public health and epidemiology experts from their respective fields of study and NCAA member schools to guide its response to the outbreak of the coronavirus disease,” the announcement said.

NCAA Chief Medical Officer Dr. Brian Hainline will head the panel. The other members include:

  • Stephanie Chu, M.D. – Team physician, University of Colorado, Boulder; Member, NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports
  • Carlos del Rio, M.D. – Chair, Hubert Department of Global Health at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health
  • Colleen Kraft, M.D. – Associate chief medical officer, Emory University Hospital
  • Vivek Murthy, M.D. – 19th Surgeon General of the United States; Member, NCAA Board of Governors
  • Mike Rodriguez– Senior director, U.S. Tennis Association and U.S. Open Security
  • William Schaffner, M.D. – Professor, Preventive Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases at Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Nicholas Clark– Coastal Carolina college athlete and Board of Governors Student-Athlete Engagement Committee chair
  • Caroline Lee– Southeastern Louisiana college athlete; NCAA Division I Student-Athlete Advisory Committee member and Division I SAAC representative to the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sport
  • Mary Northcutt– Carson-Newman college athlete; NCAA Division II Student-Athlete Advisory Committee member and Division II SAAC representative to the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sport
  • Isaiah Swann– University of Texas at Dallas college athlete; NCAA Division III Student-Athlete Advisory Committee member and Division III SAAC representative to the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sport

With college basketball’s March Madness looming, the NCAA had already said it is considering holding games without spectators present. It has not specifically addressed the upcoming NCAA Swimming & Diving Championships.

“The NCAA is committed to conducting its championships and events in a safe and responsible manner,” NCAA chief operating officer Donald Remy said. “Today we are planning to conduct our championships as planned, however, we are evaluating the COVID-19 situation daily and will make decisions accordingly.”

“This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for many of these student-athletes,” Remy told Bloomberg in an interview Monday. “As we’re thinking about these circumstance, we’re thinking about how to preserve that once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and at the same time how to make sure that any decision we make is grounded in medical science.”

Read the full story on SwimSwam: NCAA Establishes Coronavirus Advisory Panel to Guide Outbreak Response

Ultra Swim Swimmer of the Month: Erika Brown, Tennessee

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

Ultra Swim Swimmer of the Month is a recurring SwimSwam feature shedding light on a U.S.-based swimmer who has proven themselves over the past month. As with any item of recognition, Swimmer of the Month is a subjective exercise meant to highlight one athlete whose work holds noteworthy context – perhaps a swimmer who was visibly outperforming other swimmers over the month, or one whose accomplishments slipped through the cracks among other high-profile swims. If your favorite athlete wasn’t selected, feel free to respectfully recognize them in our comment section.

The Tennessee women won their first SEC title in program history, led by three dominating wins by senior Erika Brown.

Brown three-peated in all three of her races, winning her third-consecutive SEC title in the 50 free, 100 free and 100 fly. Her 50 free was a new SEC record, checking in as the third-fastest swim in history at 21.03. Her 100 free (45.83) matched both accomplishments, breaking the SEC record and sitting as the #3 swim (and #2 performer) of all-time. And her 100 fly broke the American record at 49.38, checking in as the #4 performance and #3 performer of all-time.

Brown was instrumental in Tennessee winning 3 of 5 relays at SECs. She anchored in a blistering 20.57 to give the 200 medley relay a win, outsplitting Missouri’s anchor by a full second to win by three tenths. That same night, she returned to split 1:41.08 (best in the entire field) on the 800 free relay, which won by three seconds and ranks #1 in the NCAA this season by more than a second. A 49.88 fly leg (best in the field by about another full second) pushed the 400 medley relay to a win of .07 seconds. the Vols trailed Alabama by a second when Brown left the blocks, but led by a tenth when she finished. And a field-best 21.15 leadoff on the 200 free relay helped Tennessee take second behind only a historically-fast Auburn team.

In her final SEC meet, Brown came up huge, powering Tennessee to a milestone for that rising program. For the month of February, she’s our Swimmer of the Month.

 

About Ultra Swim 

Ultra Swim is the shampoo made for swimmers. It gently removes harmful chlorine, and prevents damaged hair. So swim all you want, without sacrificing your hair.

Like Ultra Swim on Facebook

See all Ultra Swim Products here

Buy Ultra Swim at these locations

Ultra Swim is a SwimSwam partner. 

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Ultra Swim Swimmer of the Month: Erika Brown, Tennessee

BSN Sports Swim Team of the Week: O2 Performance Aquatics

$
0
0

By SwimSwam Partner Content on SwimSwam

O2 Performance Aquatics of Irving, Texas, is this week’s BSN Sports Swim Team of the Week. O2 Performance Aquatics is a year-round, USA Swimming club dedicated to helping athletes of all levels and abilities achieve their potential and reach the highest of level of the sport that they can.

BSN Sports Team Ambassador Jessica Hardy spoke with head coach Gilberto Junior to get his take on what makes O2 Performance Aquatics special, as well as some more of his thought on coaching in general.

For Junior, O2 Performance Aquatics’ team chemistry is defined by the team members’ unity and regard for each other.

Our the team is unique and very different from any other team I’ve ever coached, I believe that the diversity of members and coaches are the key to this so cool and a different atmosphere. The word team is defined as “individuals coming together to accomplish a common goal.” We are united here in the matter of how talented people are, if they don’t work well together, they won’t accomplish much the cooperation and productivity are factors of success in our team. In our team all kids often gathering in circles to talk, lots of eye contact. The handshakes, fist bumps after every practice, everyone talks to everyone else (no one is excluded), lots of questions and the most fun aspect is lots of humor and laughter. In our team we see lots of little courtesies such as thank you, excuse me, and holding doors. Those details make a great atmosphere for us to coach, our coaches are very innovative people and tight together with a great attitude, all of them have a great sense of community what make us so great they treat everyone equally.

Junior and the rest of the 02 Performance Aquatics staff are dedicated to ensuring that all swimmers on their diverse team are able to achieve their full potential.

To manage the potential of swimmers I focus on the technical, physical and psychological aspects as a whole and sometimes I just have to follow my instinct. I try to motivate athletes and their work by motivating the mind and physical abilities to improve performance to train effectively. I like to implement appropriate teaching methods the most effective and reduce the risk of injury I enforce athletes to develop new skills all the time, and to develop the athlete’s energy systems. And time to time I like to evaluation tests to monitor training progress and predicting their performance. I list clear details in the seasonal and progression training plan, normally I look for some characteristics of the athlete’s profile, such as emotional control, good concentration, a lot of confidence and commitment. For me EVERY. SINGLE. DETAIL. MATTERS! I give to my athletes every opportunity to improve as much as possible to help them to reach their full potential. They adapt gradually to the pressure imposed and adapt to the pace of training, from that point on I differentiate athletes with greater skills and mindset, giving them other opportunities to perform recognizing correctly their achievements.

No matter how experienced a coach is, there will always be struggles, and for Junior, those challenges can come from parents sometimes.

“Helicopter Parent” in old days and now the “Lawnmower Parent”, I think is the hardest challenge we face in our society and especially in our sport, they can be dangerous for the organization sometimes, over the years I had an opportunity to work with some extreme parent behavior you possibly can imagine.  When I face situations like this the first thing I do I to educate the parent, I bring them close to the organization. I give them the opportunity to lead some tasks on the team, I push them to become stroke and turn official. I know they have great intentions but maybe they don’t know how to help their child to develop into the sport.

Still, over the years, Junior has grown as a coach, something he reflected on.

I am OCD, and everything has to perfect and in the right place for me, all details have to be organized and on time, and working with people is very difficult to have this environment in your routine. Over the years of training, I think I have become more patient and I can rely more on delegating roles to others much more easily than before.

Every coach ends up with some great memories, and for many coaches, some of the most memorable moments can come from the small interactions with swimmers that occur out of the pool.

On one team, I trained in the past my assistant coach had the best  group of 8&+under, every the afternoon after training they used to stop at my office door to ask for treats. I used to have animal cracker bags, so I took a cracker and scissor, line up everyone on my door and I did cut a tiny piece of one cracker and divided between them. Was hilarious and so funny to see them every night come to me for those tiny piece holding with both hands. Those memories never did go away.

ABOUT BSN SPORTS 

Founded in 1972 as a factory-direct equipment company, today BSN SPORTS is the largest distributor of team sports apparel and equipment in the United States, with over 3,000 employees across 80 regional offices. At BSN SPORTS we believe that sports have the power to change lives. At the heart of what makes sports happen are the coaches, teachers and mentors who work with young and old alike to build meaningful lifelong experiences. That’s why our mission is simple. The more time we save coaches with everything they do off the deck, the more time they can spend changing lives. And that’s the real final score.

Get your swimmers in custom team gear with your team’s logo. My Team shop provides a one-stop-shop solution to custom apparel, suits, footwear, equipment and accessories. It’s simple to setup and the My Team Shop platform can even serve as a fundraising solution to earn dollars for your program. To set one up today email us at swimming@bsnsports.comor call 1-877-217-9027.

To learn more about BSN sports visit us at www.bsnsports.com/ib/swimming.

BSN SPORTS SWIMMING ON Instagram – @bsn_swimming

Read the full story on SwimSwam: BSN Sports Swim Team of the Week: O2 Performance Aquatics

29 Swimmers 18&Under Projected For NCAA Invites, Including 17-Year-Old Pasadyn

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

2020 NCAA DIVISION I WOMEN’S SWIMMING & DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

29 swimmers age 18 or younger are projected to earn NCAA individual invites on the women’s side, including one 17-year-old.

Harvard’s Felicia Pasadyn, 17, is locked into an NCAA invite, sitting 15th in the 200 back (1:52.56). She should also be in the mix to score in the 200 IM (1:55.88 for 17th) and should swim the 400 IM (4:08.47 for 24th). Pasadyn already ranks #30 all-time in the 17-18 age group in that backstroke, #26 all-time for 17-18s in the 200 IM and #38 all-time for 17-18s in the 400 IM.

One more 17-year-old could join her this year: Florida International’s Jasmine Nocentini is currently the second alternate, and quite likely to be added to the meet based on her 22.23 in the 50 free.

Here’s a look at the 18-and-unders currently projected to earn NCAA invites on the women’s side:

NameAgeSchool
Pasadyn, Felicia17Harvard-NE
Nocentini, Jasmine (Projected Alternate)17Florida Int’l-FG
Brunzell, Hannah18Northwestern-IL
Byrne, Lilly18Tulane-LA
Crisera, Alex18Stanford-PC
Cuomo, Lexi18Virginia-VA
Davey, Gillian18Kentucky-KY
Donohoe, Madelyn18Virginia-VA
Douglass, Kate18Virginia-VA
Dupre, Cora18Indiana-IN
Foelske, Jadé18Arizona St-AZ
Foley, Kay18NC State-NC
Fulmer, Amy18Ohio St-OH
Gillilan, Coleen18Notre Dame-IN
Hay, Abby18Louisville-KY
Looney, Lindsay18Arizona St-AZ
Marquardt, Ellie18Princeton-NJ
McNeese, Beth18Kentucky-KY
Nelson, Ella18Virginia-VA
Panitz, Josie18Ohio St-OH
Pash, Kelly18Texas-ST
Preble, Averee18Auburn-SE
Rees, Meredith18Missouri-MV
Regenauer, Christiana18Louisville-KY
Semenuk, Bridget18Texas-ST
Stege, Kristen18East Carolina-NC
Transom, Laticia-Leigh18Southern Cali-CA
Vannote, Ellie18UNC-NC
Weiss, Emily18Indiana-IN
Wheal, Emma18Stanford-PC

Both Kate Douglass and Ella Nelson set National Age Group (NAG) records at the ACC Championships, and could lower those marks at NCAAs.

Looking at last year’s psych sheets, it appears that 32 swimmers 18 or younger made the NCAA meet last year, including one 17-year-old: then-USC freshman Laticia Transom.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 29 Swimmers 18&Under Projected For NCAA Invites, Including 17-Year-Old Pasadyn

Projecting the Cutline – 2020 NCAA Women’s Division I Championships

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

2020 NCAA DIVISION I WOMEN’S SWIMMING & DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

You can see our story on the pre-selection psych sheets here.

SEE THE FULL PRE-SELECTION NCAA WOMEN’S PSYCH SHEETS HERE

Selection Criteria

The NCAA selection criteria is relatively complex, based on getting exactly 270 men and 322 women into the national championship meet. You can read the finer points of that selection criteria here, but the upshot is that the top 35 to 40 women in each event should earn an invite, while the top 28 to 33 men should be in line for invites.

2020 Cutline Projection

Though pre-selection psych sheets were revealed just a few hours ago, SwimSwam resident mathematician Andrew Mering has run the numbers to project out an early, unofficial cutline for invites to the 2020 NCAA Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships.

Our early projections show all of line 37 (the swimmers ranked 37th overall in each event) earning invites, with just one 38th-ranked swimmer getting in.

Only two athletes are ranked #1 in multiple events: Cal’s Abbey Weitzeil (50 free, 200 free) and NC State’s Sophie Hansson (100 breast, 200 breast).

Bear with us, as the complex invite process means we’ll be double-checking these projections as the day goes on and making updates as we see them:

ALTERNATES:

Athletes in the same line are added based on their relative proximity to NCAA records in their events. It’s worth noting that there’s a tie for the second alternate position with two women both sitting at 22.23 in the 50 free.

Per NCAA selection criteria, the next tiebreak is the athlete’s next-highest event, so Nocenti would be the first selected based on her 100 free (line 63) compared to Curry’s 100 free (line 79).

Update: Our projected cutline still includes Texas A&M breaststroker Anna Belousova, though she has suggested on social media that she is no longer competing for the Aggies. If that is indeed the case, Belousova would be a scratch and Aela Janvier would be called up into the meet. If Belousova is removed from the entries before selections are made, though, it would change things more drastically, with 39th-ranked 200 breaststrokers Nicole Pavlopoulou and Ashley McCauley both tying for the final invite spot. Here’s what the two options would look like:

  • Belousova scratched after NCAA invites locked in: Aela Janvier called up as top alternate
  • Belousva removed from pre-selection sheets: Nicole Pavlopoulou invited, Ashley McCauley becomes top alternate.

Priority RankLast NameFirst NameSchoolEventTime
38Janvier,AelaSouthern Cali-CA200 Backstroke1:54.01
38Nocentini,JasmineFlorida Int’l-FG50 Freestyle22.23
38Curry,CamrynArizona St-AZ50 Freestyle22.23
38Coffey,AudreyNebraska-MW1650 Freestyle16:18.56
39McCauley,AshleyGeorgia-GA200 Breaststroke2:10.14
39Pavlopoulou,NicoleSouthern Cali-CA200 Breaststroke2:10.14
39Thomas,MartinaU.S. Navy-MD200 Freestyle1:45.29
39Sichterman,MeganTennessee-SE100 Butterfly52.38
39Stewart,BayleyNotre Dame-IN200 Backstroke1:54.07
39Ilgenfritz,EmilyGeorgia Tech-GA500 Freestyle4:41.64
39Kosturos,SophiaUCLA-CA100 Backstroke52.75
39Manning,ManonKansas-MV100 Backstroke52.75

By School:

Teams are allowed up to 18 athletes at NCAAs, with divers counting as one-half a roster spot. With Virginia and Stanford leading all teams with 15 swimmers apiece, it appears no team will be in jeopardy of having to leave a qualifying swimmer or diver home – either program would need to qualify a whopping seven divers to have to face that choice. Divers qualify at next week’s Zone Championships.

TeamInvited Swimmers
Virginia-VA15
Stanford-PC15
California-PC14
Tennessee-SE12
NC State-NC12
Ohio St-OH12
Louisville-KY12
Georgia-GA11
Florida-FL11
Kentucky-KY10
Indiana-IN10
Texas A&M-GU10
Michigan-MI9
Alabama-SE9
Auburn-SE9
Southern Cali-CA8
UNC-NC8
Arizona St-AZ7
Northwestern-IL7
Texas-ST5
South Carolina-SC5
Houston-GU5
Arizona-AZ5
Missouri-MV

2020 NCAA Women’s Division I Swimming Pre-Selection Psych Sheets Drop

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

2020 NCAA Division I Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships

The NCAA has released its psych sheets for the 2020 Division I Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships, with cutlines to follow later this week.

See the full pre-selection NCAA Women’s psych sheets here

The pre-cut psych sheets don’t reveal who is invited to the meet, but do show which three events each athlete chose to enter for the NCAA Championships. The NCAA selection criteria is relatively complex, based on getting exactly 270 men and 322 women into the national championship meet. You can read the finer points of that selection criteria here, but the upshot is that the top 35 to 40 women in each event should earn an invite, while the top 28 to 33 men should be in line for invites.

Stay tuned to SwimSwam as we’ll be running the numbers ourselves and projecting the cut-line later on today. You can follow that and all the rest of our pre-NCAA Championships coverage in our event channel here.

Stanford will seek its fourth-straight NCAA title on the women’s side, with Cal looking like the chief challengers to knock off the Cardinal after finishing second for three years straight.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2020 NCAA Women’s Division I Swimming Pre-Selection Psych Sheets Drop

Scoring the 2020 NCAA Women’s D1 Pre-Selection Psych Sheets

$
0
0

By Braden Keith on SwimSwam

Data Compiled by Andrew Mering.

With Tuesday’s release of the pre-selection Women’s Division I NCAA Championship psych sheets, we were able to project where the cut-line will be drawn for invite to the national championship meet that runs March 18th-21st in Athens, Georgia.

That tells the story of who individually will earn invites to the meet (though there are likely to be a few scratches, including one we seem to know of already, to shift that picture in the next 2 weeks).

But this also allows us to start looking at the team scoring potential for the meet.

Sitting at the top of the projected team scoring, by a substantial margin, are the ACC Champion Virginia Cavaliers, followed closely by the SEC Champion Tennessee Volunteers. While Virginia has a ton of momentum, and incoming classes including swimmers like Alex and Gretchen Walsh, that left them destined to compete for national titles down the road, a title in the 2020 season would be ahead of schedule for what most expected from the Cavaliers.

The 3rd-place team is a bit of a surprise: the Cal Golden Bears. Cal definitely has a top-3 caliber roster at the NCAA Championships, so that bit is not surprising; rather, it’s that Cal is seeded so far ahead of Stanford, the three-time defending NCAA Champions. Stanford finished 373.5 points ahead of Cal at the Pac-12 Championships and won their dual meet over Cal by 89 points.

For perspective, last year Stanford led all teams in psych sheet scoring with 374 points: 3 ahead of Cal. While Stanford’s Pac-12 Championship margin was bigger last year (423 points), that they are seeded well back of Cal on paper is still surprising.

That’s one of several upended conference championship results projected. For example, the Big Ten runners-up from Michigan are projected to score more (233.5 points) than the Big Ten Champions from Ohio State (131 points).

These psych sheets don’t tell the full story of the NCAA Championship meet, although they are a reasonable starting point. There’s two other key pieces of information missing:

1. Diving – This scoring doesn’t include any diving points. Among the top teams, Stanford has the best diving squad – they scored 15 diving points at last year’s NCAA Championships, all of which return this season and all but 1 of which were scored by freshmen. That doesn’t even account for freshman Mia Paulsen, who was the Pac-12 Champion over the weekend on platform.

2. Performance – Everyone’s most (and least) favorite topic: tapers, rests, suits, illnesses, and who’s going to show up for the NCAA Championships. Most teams claim expectations of improvements from their regular season and conference meets to the NCAA Championships, but in practice very few teams accomplish it. Last year’s top-performing teams on seed-versus-actual swimming scoring were Louisville, Stanford, and Minnesota, while the worst-performing teams were Tennessee, Ohio State, and Texas.

Most Improved Teams, By Points, from Seed Scoring to Actual Scoring, 2020 NCAA Championships:

  1. Louisville +70.5
  2. Stanford +63.5
  3. Minnesota +50.5
  4. Cal +44.5
  5. (TIE) Duke/Virginia +41
  6. Arizona +37.5
  7. Michigan +19
  8. (TIE) Wisconsin/Penn State/Alabama +10

Most Dis-Improved Teams, By Points, from Seed Scoring to Actual Scoring, 2020 NCAA Championships:

  1. Tennessee -76
  2. NC State -55
  3. Auburn -51
  4. Florida -49.5
  5. Texas -31.5
  6. Georgia -28
  7. Indiana -25.5
  8. (TIE) UNC/Texas A&M -22
  9. USC -21.5

Of course even this doesn’t tell a complete picture. Some years, teams have different goals. Some years, teams get sick. Some teams have new coaches, and some of it is individually-based, with certain athletes handling the conference-nationals taper cycle better than others.

But the proof of that will come out in the pudding in March at the Gabrielsen Natatorium. Until then, all that’s left to do is argue.

Psych Sheet Scoring, 2020 NCAA Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships – Swimming Only

RankTeamSeeded Points
1Virginia-VA374
2Tennessee-SE304.5
3California-PC272
4NC State-NC247.5
5Michigan-MI233.5
6Georgia-GA217
7Stanford-PC193
8Southern Cali-CA176.5
9Kentucky-KY158.5
10Auburn-SE150
11Ohio St-OH131
12Alabama-SE130
13Florida-FL126
14Louisville-KY123
15Wisconsin-WI117
16Arizona St-AZ84
17Northwestern-IL83
18Missouri-MV79
19Texas-ST78
20Indiana-IN70
21Arkansas-AR49
22Duke-NC35.5
23UNC-NC22
24Harvard-NE19
25Texas A&M-GU14
26Minnesota-MN14
27San Diego St-SI13.5
28Princeton-NJ12
29Arizona-AZ7
30FGCU-FL7
31Florida St-FL6
32Hawaii-HI5
33South Carolina-SC5
34Houston-GU4
35Utah-UT3
36Penn St-MA1.5

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Scoring the 2020 NCAA Women’s D1 Pre-Selection Psych Sheets


2020 NAIA Women’s Nationals: SCAD Poised for a Three-peat

$
0
0

By Anne Lepesant on SwimSwam

2020 NAIA Women’s Swimming & Diving National Championship

  • Dates: March 4-7, 2020
  • Times: Prelims 9 AM; Finals 5 PM
  • Location: Allan Jones Aquatic Center – Knoxville, Tennessee (Central Time Zone)
  • Defending Champions: SCAD Savannah (2x) (results)
  • Psych Sheet
  • Live Results: Available here
  • Live Video: Available here
  • Championship Central

The 40th Annual NAIA Women’s Swimming and Diving National Championship will get underway tomorrow with swimmers and divers from 34 teams and 265 individual entries. After being hosted by the Columbus Aquatic Center in Columbus, Georgia for four years, the meet moves to the University of Tennessee’s Allan Jones Aquatic Center in Knoxville. The NAIA, which governs the athletic programs of smaller colleges and universities, has sponsored men’s swimming and diving since 1957 and women’s swimming and diving since 1981. The championship will consist of a four-day program with 20 events for each gender.

Double defending champion Savannah College of Art and Design (Savannah, GA) and 2019 runner-up Keiser University (Fort Lauderdale, FL) will each field a full roster of 18, while University of the Cumberlands (Williamsburg, KY) has qualified 16 athletes. There will be a number of new teams at the meet this year: Lincoln College (Lincoln, IL), Simpson University (Redding, CA), Sterling College (Sterling, KS), Westmont College (Santa Barbara, CA), and Williams Baptist University (Walnut Ridge, AR).

SCAD (national champions in 2016, 2018, and 2019) will return individual event winners Spencer Sheridan (200 free) and Lydia Reinhardt (200 fly). The Bees are ranked #1 in all five relays. Keiser University will have Anna Herbst (100 back champion) along with most of last year’s roster. Both SCAD and Keiser had very strong freshmen classes in 2018-19 so we can expect this rivalry to go on for several more years. Cumberlands will have another year with top performer Mendy De Rooi(500 free, 100 fly, and 100 free champion) but the Patriots’ real strength looks to be their very fast and deep freshman class. Olivet Nazarene University (Bourbonnais, IL), who won the national team title in 2017, will once again feature Karla Islas (400 IM and 1650 free champion).

While defending champion SCAD Savannah leads the psych sheet, it’s difficult to seed the meet since many teams haven’t yet had the chance to swim fully tapered (unlike NCAA swimmers going into their championships). We have tried to predict outcomes based on last year’s results in conjunction with this year’s top times.

Stars

Diving

Only a handful of teams in the NAIA have the capability to support divers. St. Ambrose University returns three-time national champion Andrea Adam and three-time runner-up TaylorMadison. Cumberlands, Lincoln, ONU, College of Idaho, and The Master’s University are the other teams that field divers.

Freestyle

SCAD could dominate the sprint freestyle events this year. The Bees have depth but they also have a strong sophomore who transferred in from UIndy this season: Sloan Sizemore. Sizemore is seeded 1st in the 50 free (23.19) and 100 free and second, behind De Rooi, in the 200 free (1:51.41). (De Rooi, however, is also top seed in the 100 fly which she won last year, so for modeling purposes we counted her in the fly.) Sizemore and De Rooi should face off in the 100 free, though, where they are seeded with 51.22 and 51.35, respectively. SCAD’s Anna Kate McGinty (23.76) and Sheridan (23.81), both sophomores, are also contenders in the 50 free. Keiser’s Elianna Kennon (23.54) and Emma Augustsson (24.08) round out the top 5 seeds. In the 100, Sizemore and De Rooi are followed by Sheridan (51.43), Kennon (51.63), and Lindsey Wilson senior Jessica Macdonald (51.68). Augustsson (1:51.79) and her freshman teammate Karina Braathen (1:53.61) are among the fastest seeds in the 200 free with Macdonald (1:53.84) and SCAD freshman Emily Elz (1:54.16). Sheridan is also entered in the 200 free (1:51.86), which she swam last year, but we scored her in the top 5 of the 100 back, where SCAD has less depth.

De Rooi is seeded first in the 500 free (5:00.99), more than 5 seconds faster than Keiser’s StefaniaSofoulis (5:06.12). SCAD’s April O’Gorman (5:10.06) and Abigail Tankersley (5:10.13) are poised to repeat their A-final appearances of 2019, and teammate Grayson Reynolds (5:10.98) hopes to join them. Keiser’s Sofoulis (17:16.49) leads the qualifiers in the mile by 10.5 seconds, with defending champion Islas (17:27.93) followed by O’Gorman (17:45.74), Paige Carter of Loyola New Orleans (17:48.67), and ShelbyMiller from The Master’s University (17:52.79).

Backstroke

Defending champion Herbst of Keiser comes in with a seed time (56.86) that is two-tenths faster than her winning time last year (57.07). (Teammate Augustsson is #2 seed on the psych sheet, but she is also second in the 200 free so we scored her there, thinking she had a better shot at the title.) SCAD sophomores Allie Rassenfoss (57.47) and Sheridan (57.96) are seeded in the top 5, as are Life freshman Dora Reizinger (57.84) and Midland sophomore Nerissa Wagner (58.08).

Reizinger tops the qualifiers in the 200 back with 2:03.18. She is followed by Cumberlands freshman Maria Basto (2:05.34), Brenau senior Yanne Toussaint (2:06.33), Rassenfoss (2:06.61), and Loyola New Orleans junior KamyAlexander (2:07.97). (Keiser’s Herbst was entered in the 200 back with the #2 seed time but we made the assumption she would swim in the 200 fly, like she did last year.)

Breaststroke

The breaststroke events are wide open this year, after years of domination from 2019 seniors from SCAD and ONU. Cumberlands junior Julia Hnidenko, who has finished in the top 3 in both the 100 and 200 breast events over the last two years, is among the breaststrokers to watch in the 100 (1:04.88) and 200 (2:21.95). Freshman Lillian Thurber (1:05.42) of Life and Ali Sippel (1:05.47) of SCAD are seeded in the top 5 of the 100. They are followed by SCAD sophomore Sarah Scargill (1:06.37) and Vivienne Kunkler (1:06.41) of the Bethel Pilots.

SCAD freshman Isabella Songis ranked 1st on the psych sheet in the 200 breast with 2:19.70. (She also leads the 100 breast qualifiers with 1:03.42 but we scored her in the 400 IM where she is 1st by nearly 5 seconds.) Keiser’s Ori Freibach (2:21.12), College of Idaho’s Caroline Yannelli (2:21.52), Hnidenko (2:21.95), and Thurber (2:22.57) will challenge Song.

Butterfly

Cumberlands junior De Rooi (54.51) is top seed in the 100 fly by nearly a full second over Keiser’s Herbst (55.45). Indiana Wesleyan sophomore Sydney Darnell, who finished third behind De Rooi and Herbst last year, is seeded 3rd with 55.72. SCAD freshman Thea Brandauer (56.69) and Keiser freshman Noelia Garzon (56.76) round out the top 5.

SCAD senior Reinhardt, who won this event last year, is the top seed in the 200 fly with 2:04.26. Herbst ranks 2nd with 2:04.56, followed by Brandauer (2:06.74), Garzon (2:07.21), and Keiser junior Anna Lofton (2:08.46).

Individual Medley

Freibach of Keiser comes in with the top time in the 200 IM (2:05.06), ranked just ahead of SCAD’s Song (2:05.49), Indiana Wesleyan’s Darnell (2:05.80), SCAD’s Brandauer (2:07.19), and Lindsey Wilson’s Macdonald (2:08.85).

Song has the edge in the 400 IM with a seed time of 4:31.33. Loyola’s Carter (4:36.23) ranks second, with Kaiser’s Gaja Kristan (4:36.89) and Lofton (4:38.04) and Indiana Wesleyan’s Linnea Holmgren (4:39.29) making up the rest of the top 5. Defending champion Islas of ONU (4:39.63) is seeded 6th.

Team Race

The top teams, scored more-or-less from the psych sheet, are as follows:

  1. SCAD Savannah 711
  2. Keiser University 641
  3. University of the Cumberlands 416
  4. Brenau University 223
  5. Life University 218
  6. Olivet Nazarene University 211
  7. Indiana Wesleyan University 205
  8. Loyola New Orleans 173
  9. Lindsey Wilson College 150
  10. Asbury University 149
  11. College of Idaho 144
  12. Ambrose University 83
  13. Lincoln College 74
  14. College of Saint Mary 56
  15. Milligan College 47

4-DAY SCHEDULE

Wednesday:
800 Freestyle Relay

Thursday:
200 Free Relay
500 Freestyle
200 Individual Medley
50 Freestyle
400 Medley Relay
1 Meter Diving (Women)

Friday:
200 Medley Relay
400 IM
100 Fly
200 Freestyle
100 Breaststroke
100 Backstroke
3-Meter Diving (Women & Men)

Saturday:
1-Meter Diving (Men)
1650 Freestyle
200 Backstroke
100 Freestyle
200 Breaststroke
200 Butterfly
1 Meter Diving (Men)
400 Freestyle Relay

2019 NAIA National Champions

Event Winner
11m DivingAndrea Adam, St. Ambrose 234.20
33m DivingAndrea Adam, St. Ambrose 222.00
5800 Free RelaySCAD 7:32.57
7200 Free RelaySCAD 1:35.78
9500 FreeMendy De Rooi, Cumberlands 4:58.82
11200 IMAndrea Vega, ONU 2:05.06
1350 FreeJessica Axford, Union 23.66
15400 Medley RelayCumberlands 3:48.58
17200 Medley RelayKeiser 1:43.86
19400 IMKarla Islas, ONU 4:26.46
21100 FlyMendy De Rooi, Cumberlands 54.41
23200 FreeSpencer Sheridan, SCAD 1:50.85
25100 BreastAndrea Vega, ONU 1:03.25
27100 BackAnna Herbst, Keiser 57.07
291650 FreeKarla Islas, ONU 17:18.54
31200 BackChristina Klouda, Cumberlands 2:02.85
33100 FreeMendy De Rooi, Cumberlands 51.45
35200 BreastAndrea Vega, ONU 2:17.43
37200 FlyLydia Reinhardt, SCAD 2:04.23
39400 Free RelayKeiser 3:29.28

2019 NAIA National Final Results (top 10 women’s teams)

  1. SCAD Savannah 638.5
  2. Keiser University 477.5
  3. University of the Cumberlands 392.5
  4. Olivet Nazarene University 306.5
  5. College of Idaho 242
  6. Loyola New Orleans 181
  7. Indiana Wesleyan University 176
  8. Lindsey Wilson College 175
  9. Lindenwood Belleville 171.5
  10. Brenau University 149

“The National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA), headquartered in Kansas City, Mo., is a governing body of small athletics programs that are dedicated to character-driven intercollegiate athletics.

In 2000, the NAIA reaffirmed its purpose to enhance the character building aspects of sport. Through Champions of Character, the NAIA seeks to create an environment in which every student-athlete, coach, official and spectator is committed to the true spirit of competition through five core values.”

 

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2020 NAIA Women’s Nationals: SCAD Poised for a Three-peat

El Abogado De Sun Alega La Falsedad De La Condena Y Apoya Apelar La Sanción

$
0
0

By Tomas Rodriguez ES on SwimSwam

Un día después de que el Comité de Árbitros en el Deporte sancionara al nadador olímpico chino Sun Yang con 8 años fuera de la competición, el abogado del deportista hizo pública una declaración en la que indicó que “el comité escuchó los prejuicios” y “aceptó las mentiras” en este caso.

Según informó ChannelNewsAsia, Zhang Qihuai, el abogado de Sun, calificó la sanción como “un día oscuro,” y la comparó con “la superación de lo maligno a la justicia.”

“El 28 de febrero de 2020 fue un día oscuro,” Zhang afirmaba a través de su declaración.”Demuestra una escena donde el mal supera a la justicia y el poder reemplaza a las verdades evidentes.”

“En este día, el comité escuchó los prejuicios, miró a otro lado en lo que a las normas y procesos se refiere, y aceptó todas las mentiras y la evidencia falsa.”

Zhang apoyó por apelar la decisión basándose en “una serie de errores en el proceso.”

El triple campeón olímpico Sun Yang ha sido suspendido con ocho años fuera de la competición, la máxima sanción, tras un incidente que ocurriera durante un control antidopaje fuera de competición hacia septiembre de 2018. Durante aquel control, Sun atemperó contra los procesos de control contra el dopaje y la autorización de los agentes que llevaban dicho control a cabo, que acabó con la fractura de un bote que contenía sangre sustraída del deportista durante el control. En principio Sun había recibido el visto bueno por parte de un panel contra el dopaje asociado a la FINA, aunque la AMA apeló al Comité de Árbitros en el Deporte, quien sancionó a Sun con ocho años fuera de competición.

Según informamos a través del canal en inglés, Sun llevó el asunto a las redes sociales, donde indicó que estaba insatisfecho por la decisión y donde insistió en su inocencia. Sun además indicó que planeaba apelar al Tribunal Supremo Suizo.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: El Abogado De Sun Alega La Falsedad De La Condena Y Apoya Apelar La Sanción

Florida State Adds Verbal Commitment from Zachary Smith for 2020

$
0
0

By Jack McCormick on SwimSwam

Fitter and Faster Swim Camps is the proud sponsor of SwimSwam’s College Recruiting Channel and all commitment news. For many, swimming in college is a lifelong dream that is pursued with dedication and determination. Fitter and Faster is proud to honor these athletes and those who supported them on their journey.

Distance specialistZachary Smith has announced his verbal commitment to join the Florida State Seminoles beginning in the fall of 2020. Smith is from Sykesville, Maryland where he attends the McDonogh School and swims for the Eagle Swim Team.

Last month Smith competed at the Maryland Swimming Senior Short Course Championship where he swam new bests in both the 200 free (1:42.16) and 400 IM (4:06.21). His top finishes at the meet came in the 1000 and 1650 freestyles where he touched in 2nd, narrowly missing his best times. Last December he competed at the U.S. Open in Atlanta, Georgia. Competing in long course, he finished with a new best time of 8:22.87 in the 800 free.

Top SCY Times

  • 200 fly – 1:48.93
  • 200 free – 1:42.16
  • 500 free – 4:31.54
  • 1000 free – 9:14.23
  • 1650 free – 15:36.98
  • 400 IM – 4:06.21

The Seminoles wrapped up their regular season last month with a 5th place finish at the 2020 ACC Swimming and Diving Championships. With his current best times Smith would have narrowly missed qualifying for the C-final of the 200 fly as well as scoring in the top 24 of the 1650 free. He would have finished 29th in the 200 fly and 28th in the 1650, both just outside of scoring range.

Florida State’s distance group was led by a pair of freshman this season. Smith will have three years of overlap as both Scott Pekarske, FSU’s top finisher in the 1650, and Aziz Ghaffari, their top finisher in the 500 free, still hold three years of NCAA eligibility.

If you have a commitment to report, please send an email with a photo (landscape, or horizontal, looks best) and a quote to Recruits@swimswam.com.

About the Fitter and Faster Swim Tour 

Fitter & Faster Swim Camps feature the most innovative teaching platforms for competitive swimmers of all levels. Camps are produced year-round throughout the USA and Canada. All camps are led by elite swimmers and coaches. Visit fitterandfaster.com to find or request a swim camp near you.

FFT SOCIAL

Instagram – @fitterandfasterswimtour

Facebook – @fitterandfastertour

Twitter – @fitterandfaster

FFT is a SwimSwam partner.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Florida State Adds Verbal Commitment from Zachary Smith for 2020

Pitt’s Blaise Vera on Friendly Wagers And Highest-Ever ACC Team Finish (Video)

$
0
0

By Reid Carlson on SwimSwam

2020 ACC MEN’S SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

  • When: Wednesday, February 26th to Saturday, February 29th Prelims 10:00 am | Finals 6:00 pm (1650 prelims Saturday at 4:00 pm)
  • Where: Greensboro Aquatic Center, Greensboro, North Carolina (Eastern Time Zone)
  • Defending Champion: North Carolina State University (NC State) (29x, 5th-straight) (results)
  • Streaming: ACC Network
  • Championship Central: Here
  • Detailed Timeline: Here
  • Psych Sheets: Here
  • Live Results

 

Reported by Robert Gibbs.

Thursday

50 FREESTYLE – FINALS

  • ACC championship record – 18.68, Ryan Held (NC State), 2018
  • ACC record – 18.56, Ryan Held (NC State), 2017
  • 2019 champion – Will Pisani (FSU), 19.21
  1. Nyls Korstanje (NC State) – 19.25
  2. Abdelrahman Sameh (Louisville) – 19.31
  3. Peter Varjasi (Florida State) – 19.35

Nyls Korstanje captured his first ACC title in this event after finishing 4th last year. This burning, he burned up the pool with a 19.07, and while he was a little off of that tonight, it was enough to secure the victory.

The men who finished 2nd-4th were the only three men in the field to drop time from this morning, and they all touched within 0.11s. Louisville freshman Abdelrahman Sameh dropped two-tenths to take silver in 19.31, a new lifetime beset for him. According to the broadcast team, Louisville tried questioning the results, thinking that Sameh had somehow managed to touched ahead of Korstanje, although the results seem to have stood.

Florida State’s Peter Varjasi also continued a strong freshman campaign by taking 3rd in 19.35. Virginia senior Ryan Baker captured a 4th place finish in 19.42, setting a new lifetime best in his last individual ACC 50 free.

The rest of the field all added time from this morning. Virginia Tech’s Tommy Hallock and Pitt’s Blaise Vera took 5th and 6th with times of 19.49 and 19.54. Louisville ended up in 7th and 8th, as both Mihalis Deliyannis (19.65) and Andrej Barna (19.97) added fairly big chunks from this morning. It’ll be interesting to see how Barna does this week, as he missed the first half of the season, presumably due to some illness or injury.

It’s taken a 19.35 or 19.36 to qualify for NCAAs in this event the last year two years, meaning that only Korstanje was well under that mark tonight, although Vera was 19.10 early this season and Deliyannis could be safe with his 19.25.

Friday

100 FLY – FINALS

  • ACC record: 44.46 – Coleman Stewart (NC State), 2019
  • ACC meet record: 44.79 – Ryan Held (NC State), 2018
  • 2019 champion: Kanoa Kaleoaloha (Florida State), 44.93
  1. Nick Albiero (Louisville) – 44.86
  2. Coleman Stewart (NC State) – 44.92
  3. Nyls Korstanje (NC State) – 45.47

Coleman Stewart was hunting for his first ACC title in this event after finishing 2nd the last two year, and at first he looked like he was going to be successful. He went out in 20.72, and looked to be in control at the final turn. Nick Albiero, who had the fastest time in prelims (43.83), appeared to be a little long on the first turn, and was 0.19s behind Stewart at the halfway point. But Albiero stormed home down the final few yards and managed to get to the wall just ahead of Stewart, 44.86 to 44.92.

Both men were faster than last year, when Stewart took 2nd in 45.09, and Albiero took 4th in 45.37.

NC State still earned big points in this event, as Nyls Korstanje took 3rd in 45.47,  new personal best for him, after taking 9th here last year. The Wolfpack also got a 5th place finish from Noah Hensley (45.71) and an 8th place finish from Luke Sobolewski (46.56).

Virginia Tech took 4th and 7th with the efforts of Blake Manoff (45.60) and Antani Ivanov (45.77). Pitt’s Blaise Vera almost perfectly matched his time from this morning (46.22 tonight vs 46.21 this morning) to take 6th.

Saturday

100 FREE – FINALS

  • ACC record: 41.05 – Ryan Held (NC State), 2018
  • ACC meet record: 41.41 – Ryan Held (NC State), 2018
  • 2019 champion: Kanoa Kaleoaloha (Florida State), 42.34
  1. Nyls Korstanje (NC State) – 42.13
  2. Peter Varjasi (Florida State) – 42.68
  3. Andrej Barna (Louisville) / Will Messenger (North Carolina) – 42.69

NC State sophomore Nyls Korstanje completed his sweep of the two shortest freestyle events, going 42.13 from lane 1 to take the victory here, after winning the 50 free on Thursday. That’s Korstanje’s 2nd-fastest time ever, behind only 41.91 from last year’s NCAAs, and puts him roughly 6th in the nation this season.

The race for 2nd was incredibly tight. Florida State’s Peter Varjasi just got his hand on the wall first with a 42.68. Louisville’s Andrej Barna and UNC’s Will Messenger tied for 3rd at 42.69, with UVA’s Ryan Baker just a hair behind at 42.72.

Duke’s Miles Williams, who had the fastest time in prelims, touched 6th in 42.90, followed by Louisville’s Abdelrahman Sameh (43.03) and Virginia Tech’s Tommy Hallock (43.14).

Pitt’s Blaise Vera, who took 2nd last year, but missed the A-final this morning, won the B-final with a 42.61 that would’ve earned him 2nd in the A-final tonight.

FINAL TEAM STANDINGS

  1. NC State – 1250
  2. Virginia – 1089
  3. Louisville – 1066.5
  4. Virginia Tech – 898
  5. Florida State – 812.5
  6. Notre Dame – 803.5
  7. North Carolina – 630.5
  8. Pitt – 520
  9. Georgia Tech – 506
  10. Duke – 421
  11. Miami – 197
  12. Boston College – 134

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Pitt’s Blaise Vera on Friendly Wagers And Highest-Ever ACC Team Finish (Video)

Virginia Tech’s Blake Manoff Discusses 4th-Place Team Finish at ACCs (Video)

$
0
0

By Reid Carlson on SwimSwam

2020 ACC MEN’S SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

  • When: Wednesday, February 26th to Saturday, February 29th Prelims 10:00 am | Finals 6:00 pm (1650 prelims Saturday at 4:00 pm)
  • Where: Greensboro Aquatic Center, Greensboro, North Carolina (Eastern Time Zone)
  • Defending Champion: North Carolina State University (NC State) (29x, 5th-straight) (results)
  • Streaming: ACC Network
  • Championship Central: Here
  • Detailed Timeline: Here
  • Psych Sheets: Here
  • Live Results

 

Reported by Robert Gibbs.

Friday

100 FLY – FINALS

  • ACC record: 44.46 – Coleman Stewart (NC State), 2019
  • ACC meet record: 44.79 – Ryan Held (NC State), 2018
  • 2019 champion: Kanoa Kaleoaloha (Florida State), 44.93
  1. Nick Albiero (Louisville) – 44.86
  2. Coleman Stewart (NC State) – 44.92
  3. Nyls Korstanje (NC State) – 45.47

Coleman Stewart was hunting for his first ACC title in this event after finishing 2nd the last two year, and at first he looked like he was going to be successful. He went out in 20.72, and looked to be in control at the final turn. Nick Albiero, who had the fastest time in prelims (43.83), appeared to be a little long on the first turn, and was 0.19s behind Stewart at the halfway point. But Albiero stormed home down the final few yards and managed to get to the wall just ahead of Stewart, 44.86 to 44.92.

Both men were faster than last year, when Stewart took 2nd in 45.09, and Albiero took 4th in 45.37.

NC State still earned big points in this event, as Nyls Korstanje took 3rd in 45.47,  new personal best for him, after taking 9th here last year. The Wolfpack also got a 5th place finish from Noah Hensley (45.71) and an 8th place finish from Luke Sobolewski (46.56).

Virginia Tech took 4th and 7th with the efforts of Blake Manoff (45.60) and Antani Ivanov (45.77). Pitt’s Blaise Vera almost perfectly matched his time from this morning (46.22 tonight vs 46.21 this morning) to take 6th.

Saturday

200 FLY – FINALS

  • ACC record: 1:38.57 – Andreas Vazaois (NC State), 2019
  • ACC meet record: 1:40.51 – Nick Albiero (Louisville), 2020
  • 2019 champion: Nick Albiero (Louisville), 1:40.70
  1. Nick Albiero (Louisville) – 1:38.65
  2. Blake Manoff (Virginia Tech) – 1:40.48
  3. Antani Ivanov (Virginia Tech) – 1:41.01

Nick Albiero came within a tenth of a second of the overall conference record, blasting a 1:38.65 that moves him up to #1 in the nation this season. That’s Albiero 2nd-straight victory in this event, completes the fly sweep this week, and breaks his own conference meet record from this morning.

Virginia Tech swept the next two spots. Blake Manoff moves to #3 this season with a 1:40.48, a NCAA ‘A’ cut, and Antani Ivanov took 3rd here for the second season in a row with his time of 1:41.01.

UVA’s Ted Schubert, who swept the IMs over the last two days, touched 4th here with a 1:41.34. That’s a new personal best for him by 0.01s; he took 6th in this event last year.

NC State sophomore Zach Brown moved from 8th in this event last year to 5th this year with his time of 1:42.30. Teammate Erge Gezmis finished 7th in 1:44.00.

Georgia Tech’s Christian Ferraro (1:42.93) took 6th, and FSU’s Max Polianski (1:47.17) took 8th.

FINAL TEAM STANDINGS

  1. NC State – 1250
  2. Virginia – 1089
  3. Louisville – 1066.5
  4. Virginia Tech – 898
  5. Florida State – 812.5
  6. Notre Dame – 803.5
  7. North Carolina – 630.5
  8. Pitt – 520
  9. Georgia Tech – 506
  10. Duke – 421
  11. Miami – 197
  12. Boston College – 134

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Virginia Tech’s Blake Manoff Discusses 4th-Place Team Finish at ACCs (Video)

Coronavirus: La Delegazione Italiana Non Parteciperà Alla Coppa LEN

$
0
0

By Giusy Cisale on SwimSwam

Coronavirus ancora protagonista delle notizie sportive in Italia.

In un comunicato stampa la Federazione Italiana Nuoto ha annullato la convocazione degli atleti italiani per la Coppa LEN di fondo. La tappa si svolgerà ad Eilat domenica 8 Marzo.

Questa la comunicazione:

Considerate le restinzioni d’ingresso imposte dallo Stato d’Israele nei propri territori per la prevenzione della diffusione del Covid-19 che riguardano tutti i cittadini non israeliani provenienti dall’Italia, si comunica che la delegazione italiana non potrà partecipare alla prima tappa di Coppa Len di Eilat in programma il prossimo 8 marzo.

Gli atleti convocati per la 10 km erano:

CORONAVIRUS– LE DISPOSIZIONI ATTUALI

Ieri il presidente della FIN Paolo Barelli ha pubblicato una lettera aperta ad integrazione e chiarimento della precedente nota del 2 Marzo.

Al momento, resta in vigore quanto statuito nel comunicato datato 2 Marzo 2020.

NOTA DEL 2 MARZO 2020

La FIN, Federazione Italiana Nuotoriprende appieno ogni attività.

Lo comunica ufficialmente sul sito web, dove si legge:

Tutta l’attività federale. Le competizioni e manifestazioni sportive di ogni livello e dislocazione, si intende ripresa regolarmente in conformità alle disposizioni governative.

Il comunicato stampa prosegue poi con le indicazioni per le Regioni più colpite dall’emergenza coronavirus

Tra le prescrizioni vi sono:

  • possibilità di allenamenti a porte chiuse per gli agonisti
  • divieto di trasferta dalle regioni a rischio.

Vediamo nel dettaglio.

EMILIA-ROMAGNA, LOMBARDIA, VENETO, PROVINCE DI PESARO E URBINO E SAVONA

Per le Regioni Emilia Romagna, Lombardia, Veneto e nelle province di Pesaro Urbino e Savona, viene precisato:

[…] E’ previsto:

  • la sospensione degli eventi e delle competizioni sino all’8 marzo 2020 a meno che non si svolgano “a porte chiuse“.
  • Restano consentite le sessioni di allenamento degli atleti agonisti a porte chiuse.
  • Si raccomanda di adottare misure per garantire agli atleti la possibilità di rispettare, negli spogliatoi, la distanza tra loro di almeno un metro
  • Il divieto di trasferta organizzata dei tifosi residenti nelle zone di cui sopra

DISPOSIZIONI PER I COMUNI DI BERTONICO, CASALPUSTERLENGO, CASTELGERUNDO, CASTIGLIONE D’ADDA, CODOGNO, FOMBIO, MALEO, SAN FIORANO, SOMAGLIA, TERRANOVA DEI PASSERINI E VO

Nei comuni di cui sopra è previsto:

  • la sospensione degli eventi e delle competizioni sportive sino all’8 marzo 2020, almeno che non si svolgano “a porte chiuse”.
  • Restano consentite le sessioni di allenamento degli atleti agonisti a porte chiuse
  • Garantire agli atleti la possibilità di rispettare, negli spogliatoi, la distanza tra loro di almeno un metro;
  • Divieto di trasferta organizzata dei tifosi residenti nelle zone di cui sopra

E’ possibile leggere il comunicato stampa integrale cliccando qui

Per l’approfondimento sulla sospensione delle attività clicca qui

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Coronavirus: La Delegazione Italiana Non Parteciperà Alla Coppa LEN

Evolution of Backstroke

$
0
0

By SwimSwam Partner Content on SwimSwam

Courtesy: RITTER Sports Performance, a SwimSwam partner. 

All strokes in swimming evolve but backstroke is an interesting case study. There’s also probably not another stroke that the United States in particular has been so dominant for so long.

In the 70’s John Naber and Rick Carey set the standards. But then one of the bigger evolutions of the stroke happened in the 1980s and it was on display by the next American to break the world record.

David Berkoff broke the 100m World Record, not once but twice in one day on August 12, 1988. In doing so he was the first to break the 55.00 barrier. What helped him accomplish such a feat? Using what would become known as the “Berkoff Blastoff”.

Berkoff weaponized the underwater dolphin kick, many times going the majority of the race underwater. In fact, Berkoff’s use of the underwater dolphin kick was so effective it was one of the drivers in the rule change to implement the 15m limit for underwater kicking for backstroke.

This sparked the need to utilize underwater kicking in backstroke but maximizing it to the first 15m under the new rules.

The next evolution was how much faster of a tempo many backstrokers were utilizing, whether the 100 or even at the 200 level. This paved the wave for more American dominance including names like Lenny Krayzelburg, Natalie Coughlin and Aaron Peirsol (whose 200m World Record still stands as one of the oldest on the books currently).

Braden Holloway of NC State University talked with Chris Ritter about the how backstroke has continued to evolve since Braden swam to now when he’s coaching some of the best backstrokers in the country, includingColeman Stewart (who just broke BOTH ACC records) and now Berkoff’s daughter (Katharine) is a budding backstroke star as a freshman at NC State.

You can see the full interview in The Hive powered by RITTER, where Braden expands on what he thinks is the most critical change in backstroke in the last decade. And has helped propel the success of current World Record holders Regan Smith and Ryan Murphy.

It’s a good reminder that as a coach you need to be continually evolving because the sport is constantly. So, if you’re not as a coach that means you’re inevitably holding your swimmers’ progress back in the long run.

What Braden Holloway has consistently done in his tenure at NC State runs parallel to his prime stroke as a swimmer (backstroke) – continually evolving to achieve excellence. It’ll be exciting to see how well the NC State backstrokers do in particular at NCAAs in a few weeks.

If you want to learn more from coaches like Braden and others that are on the cutting edge of the sport and seeing success with their athletes you’ll want to check out all that’s offered in The Hive powered by RITTER.

Join The Hive for just $1to learn more on the evolution of Backstroke and more!

About RITTER Sports Performance:
RITTER Sports Performance helps swimmers go faster and coaches get better, worldwide. Through our online resources on strength training, stroke technique, swim-training, race analysis or nutritional coaching–RITTER is ready to help take your swimming to the next level. Are you?

CONNECT WITH RITTER SPORTS PERFORMANCE:

WEBSITE

INSTAGRAM

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

APPLE PODCAST

GOOGLE PLAY

SPOTIFY

SOUNDCLOUD

RITTER Sports Performance is a SwimSwam partner.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Evolution of Backstroke


How Swim Coaches Can Help Develop Highly Motivated Swimmers

$
0
0

By Olivier Poirier-Leroy on SwimSwam

by Olivier Poirier-Leroy. You can join his weekly motivational newsletter for swimmers by clicking here.

Motivation.

We need it, we love it, and we are stoked when swimmers walk out onto the pool deck full of it.

Every coach’s dream scenario is to have every swimmer on the team rolling in to the pool with 25 mega-watts of motivation.

Of course, you know this isn’t realistic.

Even your most motivated athletes will have motivational lapses when they are injured, during exhausting stretches of workouts (heavy training sends our mood profiles crashing), or when they experience feeling stuck.

While ultimately it is on swimmers to decide to want to be there, there are some ways that you can create a climate and culture at the pool that brings up the motivational level of all the athletes on your squad.

Pitter patter, let’s get at ‘er!

1. Teamwork makes the motivation work.

Although swimmers tend to focus on their individual goals, cooperation and a feeling of togetherness can help boost intrinsic motivation.

One study of PE students found that when the participants worked in pairs or small groups to help one another reach common goals relatedness, intrinsic motivation and intention to do sport all went up.

There are lots of ways to help implement a sense of cooperation on the team. Some ideas include:

The upside on having a team that cooperates is all upside: you develop legendary team culture, the swimmers are more motivated to be there, and all that fun and cooperation translates into better training and performances.

2. Use extrinsic rewards to foster intrinsic motivation.

Swim coaches would love for their athletes to all be full to the brim with intrinsic motivation. That is, their swimmers all walk out onto the pool deck and work hard for the enjoyment and satisfaction that comes from leaving it all in the water on a daily basis.

High-performance swimmers, the Ledeckys, the Dressels, tend to enjoy the workand run on intrinsic motivation.

But extrinsic rewards, when done properly, can play a role in fostering intrinsic motivation.

Things like weekly awards for “Grinder of the Week”, a board with in-practice bests, and rewards for the swimmers who hit 100% attendance creates opportunities for recognition and tops up the intrinsic motivation of your swimmers.

The key with extrinsic rewards is that they foster a sense of competency or mastery.

Extrinsic rewards can quickly lose their effectiveness when the athlete feels as though they are being bribed or controlled.

When rewards don’t emphasize competency, they come across as being manipulative. The effect of this ends up being counter-productive to intrinsic motivation.

3. Progress is motivating.

When swimmers struggle at swim practice, or they aren’t improving as fast as they think they should be, or they have convinced themselves they have fallen butt-first into a plateau, you can almost see the motivation to work hard drain from their faces.

Progression and improvement are the most motivating things on the planet.

Seeing their hard work producing tangible results will keep them going through the hard main sets, the 60,000-meter weeks of training, and the never-ending haul of a season.

But how do you mark progression when they are under heavy training? Or when the big meet is still weeks or months off? How do you keep them on track and locked in when they are fatigued and exhausted and are ready to throw their kickboard across the pool deck in frustration?

Start by emphasizing and rewarding other markers of improvement.

Swimmers (and coaches, too) are obsessed with the clock. If our pace is off, or we are swimming slower than we usually do, a practice or set can feel like a waste of time. If we aren’t getting faster, what’s the point?

There are tons of other markers for improvement which signals competency, the foundation of intrinsic motivation.

Gamify the swimming of your athletes, particularly during those heavy stretches of training where the speed might not be there, with things like stroke countskicks off the wall, breath control work, and in-practice best times for kick/pull.

Progression isn’t measured solely by what the clock reads, although it’s the first thing we look at when we wanna see where things are at. There are an endless number of ways to mark progression and foster the motivation that comes along with it.

Progression signals competency, which kick-starts a super fun little cycle of improvement and motivation that develops elite swimming.

4. Emphasize process goals over outcome goals.

As a coach, you already know the power of emphasizing the process over the results. Swimmers who put their energy and focus on the day to day routine and process are less prone to the wild swings of inconsistent training, stress less about the things they don’t control, and are better prepared for race day.

When athletes are focused solely on the outcome, little disruptions in their training schedule take on a more serious note. A missed practice approaches apocalyptic levels of panic. When their competition throws down a monster time at a meet, the outcome-oriented swimmer tends to panic.

Focus on building a program that rewards the process. That takes pride and value in the swimmers who execute the best on a daily basis. Make becoming process-oriented a focal point of your team culture and daily training.

The process is where champions are made. It’s also where they tap into a nearly bottomless supply of intrinsic motivation.

University of Toronto coach Byron MacDonald, who coaches Olympic medalist and occasional world record holder Kylie Masse, notes that one of her biggest strengths is her ability to keep herself mentally dialed in on the process.

“A lot of people worry about the outcome and she just focuses on the process and likes to challenge herself,” says MacDonald.

How do you start realigning the mindset of your swimmers to a more process-based approach? Have them write out a sample daily process. The handful of things that they will focus on each day that will help launch them towards their goals.

5. Pair up swimmers of similar ability and let them race it out.

Competition is motivating. Researchers have consistently found that when we exercise next to someone or race against one of our rivals our motivation to perform well goes up.

This is one of the perks of having swimmers of the same age training for the same events—they are more likely to go at it in practice and produce a bigger effort than they would if swimming on their own.

When designing your swim workouts and athletes are picking their lanes, place an emphasis on swimmers of relatively the same speed swimming against each other. It will bring the compete level up and motivate swimmers to go a little faster.

The Goldilocks rule is in effect with this motivational strategy, however. Put a slow swimmer against a fast swimmer and more often than not the fast swimmer will ease of on her or his effort. Same thing with a slow swimmer racing a much faster swimmer.

Building a culture of motivation

Try out some of the tips above during your swim practices over the next few weeks.

Developing a positive team culture takes time, so don’t be discouraged if you aren’t seeing overnight results from your efforts.

The key takeaways:

  • Put swimmers in pairs and small groups for peer coaching/mentoring and team building exercises
  • Use extrinsic rewards strategically to kickstart intrinsic motivation
  • Have markers of progression that aren’t based on the clock
  • Emphasize a process-based approach to training and preparation
  • Have swimmers of similar ability and speed race each other

ABOUT OLIVIER POIRIER-LEROY

Olivier is a former national level swimmer who is obsessed with helping swimmers develop a high-performance mindset in the pool. He’s the publisher of YourSwimBook, a ten-month log book for competitive swimmers.

Conquer the Pool Mental Training Book for SwimmersHe’s also the author of the recently published mental training workbook for competitive swimmers, Conquer the Pool: The Swimmer’s Ultimate Guide to a High Performance Mindset.

It combines sport psychology research, worksheets, and anecdotes and examples of Olympians past and present to give swimmers everything they need to conquer the mental side of the sport.

The book was written with the feedback of 200+ Olympic champions, head coaches, former world record holders and NCAA champions.

Ready to take your mindset to the next level?

Click here to learn more about Conquer the Pool.

COACHES & CLUBS: Yuppers–we do team orders of “Conquer the Pool” which includes a team discount as well as complimentary branding (your club logo on the cover of the book) at no additional charge.

Want more details? Click here for a free estimate on a team order of CTP.

Read the full story on SwimSwam: How Swim Coaches Can Help Develop Highly Motivated Swimmers

Quiénes son y cómo llegan los 24 argentinos para el Sudamericano

$
0
0

By Fernando Cicutti on SwimSwam

Se acerca el Campeonato Sudamericano de Buenos Aires, del 25 al 29 de marzo, en el natatorio del Parque Roca que albergó los Juegos Olímpicos de la Juventud en 2018. Y la Selección Argentina ya tiene definido su equipo con 24 representantes, muchos de ellos culminando una preparación exhaustiva para este torneo.

Delfina Pignatiello lidera la delegación local, en la que será su primera competencia internacional después de una fantástica actuación en los Juegos Panamericanos de Lima 2019. La tricampeona de los 400, 800 y 1500 libre, clasificada a Tokio 2020 más de un año antes de los Juegos, viene de entrenarse durante un mes en Australia, junto a su nueva compañera de equipo tanto en Argentina como en Brasil, Virginia Bardach.

Al igual que en 2019, bajo la supervisión del exitoso Bill Sweetenham, las dos nadadoras disfrutaron de las instalaciones del Gold Coast Aquatic Centre, donde también aprovecharon el verano del hemisferio Sur otros nadadores europeos y asiáticos del nivel de Adam Peaty, presente en el mismo predio junto al seleccionado británico.

Por allí también pasó Federico Grabich, el medallista mundial de 2015, que intentará esta vez clasificarse a su tercer Juego Olímpico, con más chances de conseguir el índice FINA en los 200 libre. Su puesta a punto para el Sudamericano incluyó 5 semanas en Australia, donde también había estado años anteriores en su búsqueda por volver al mejor nivel.

También Bardach buscará en Buenos Aires las marcas que le permitan clasificarse por segunda vez a una cita olímpica, después de un impulso anímico gigante que representó su medalla dorada panamericana en los 200 mariposa de Lima 2019.

La otra nadadora argentina ya clasificada a Tokio 2020 es Julia Sebastian, con mínimas conseguidas en los Panamericanos tanto en los 100 como en lo 200 pecho, las dos pruebas que también le reportaron medallas en la capital peruana. Radicada en Brasil desde 2016, la santafecina interrumpirá sus entrenamientos en el Minas Tenis Club para volver a nadar en la Argentina después de mucho tiempo. Algo similar hará Florencia Perotti, actualmente en San Pablo, entrenando con su equipo, el Pinheiros.

Sólo faltará en Buenos Aires el tercer clasificado que tiene la natación argentina para los próximos Juegos Olímpicos: Santiago Grassi, también con índice para Tokio 2020 logrado en la clasificación de los 100 mariposa de Lima 2019, se verá imposibilitado de competir por la Argentina por sus compromisos en Estados Unidos, donde se entrena y representa a la Universidad de Auburn.

Otro grupo de argentinos se preparó especialmente en la altura de Colombia. Los espaldistas Andrea Berrino y Agustín Hernández, junto al pechista Gabriel Morelli, también tienen aspiraciones olímpicas para este Sudamericano. Por ello, los tres argentinos intensificaron sus entrenamientos en Duitama, departamento de Boyacá, al norte de la capital colombiana de Bogotá, beneficiados por un exigente trabajo a 2530 metros sobre el nivel del mar.

También eligió la altitud Ivo Cassini, después de comenzar el año compitiendo en los 10 km de Doha, Qatar, la primera fecha del circuito FINA de maratones. Ahora se encuentra en los 3400 metros de La Quiaca, en el norte de la Argentina, en el mismo lugar donde se preparó Georgina Bardach hace 16 años para luego ganar la medalla olímpica en los 400 combinado de Atenas 2004. El nadador marplatense buscará acercarse a la mínima olímpica de los 1500 libre.

El que se quedó fuera en esa prueba es Martín Carrizo, que podría haber llevado a 25 el total de nadadores argentinos en la pileta del Parque Roca. Sin embargo, una intervención quirúrgica le impidió entrenarse durante los meses posteriores a los Juegos Panamericanos de Lima 2019, donde había vuelto a competir tras los dos años de sanción por doping. Esta vez, la Confederación Argentina De Deportes Acuáticos (CADDA) le exigió una toma de tiempos para confirmar su selección, pero el nadador no pudo cumplir esta semana con el tope solicitado.

Otro caso especial es el de Joaquín González Piñero, el flamante dueño del récord nacional de los 200 combinado. Como el juvenil de 17 años reside en Dubai, Emiratos Árabes, en los próximos días viajará exclusivamente para competir en este Campeonato Sudamericano, su primero entre los mayores.

El resto de la delegación argentina ya está en Buenos Aires realizando una concentración previa al certamen continental. Entre ellos se destaca otro juvenil, Juan Ignacio Méndez, que también batió un récord en diciembre pasado, en su caso el más antiguo de la natación argentina, el de los 200 espalda.

Cabe resaltar que una vez finalizado el Sudamericano, todavía quedará otra chance importante para llegar a Tokio 2020. La CADDA les dará una posibilidad más de clasificación a algunos nadadores, que serán especialmente designados para competir por Argentina en el ex Trofeo María Lenk, este año designado Selectivo Olímpico para Brasil, del 20 al 25 de abril en Río de Janeiro.

A ellos se sumarán las nadadoras que ya compiten para clubes brasileños, con varios cambios en el mercado de pases de este 2020, el último recientemente confirmado: Macarena Ceballos finalmente nadará para el Curitibano. Las otras seis argentinas ya tenían definido su vínculo en Brasil desde comienzos de año.

A continuación, la lista oficial de los 24 nadadores argentinos que competirán en el próximo Campeonato Sudamericano:

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Quiénes son y cómo llegan los 24 argentinos para el Sudamericano

SwimSwam Voters Picks: Week 3 of Major 2020 NCAA Conference Championships

$
0
0

By Jared Anderson on SwimSwam

We’ve spent the past few weeks using our periodic SwimSwam polls to let readers weigh in on the coming conference swimming & diving championships. Now, we’re compiling the data for final major conference championship in week 3.

Keep in mind that each of these lists are compiling something slightly different:

  • Voters picks were specifically to pick the conference champ. That means the #2 team might not be the consensus to finish second, but picked by voters as the second-most-likely to win. Those can be two different things, especially with high-ceiling teams.
  • Swimulator projections track projected scoring based on season-best times for athletes in their three best events. This data can be skewed by many factors, like teams that didn’t fully rest at mid-season, teams that don’t have a rested time in one of the five relays, teams reliant on diving (not included in Swimulator projections) or teams who added new talent during the season.
  • SwimSwam Picks are from our fan guides for each conference. They’re based on a combination of Swimulator projections, historical taper drop data and our own predictions.

Pac-12 Men

Voter Picks:

  1. California – 88.0%
  2. Stanford – 7.0%
  3. Utah – 2.1%
  4. Arizona State – 1.6%
  5. Arizona – 0.8%
  6. USC – 0.5%

Swimulator Projections:

  1. California – 828.5
  2. Arizona – 568.5
  3. Arizona State – 503.5
  4. Stanford – 366.5
  5. Utah – 338.5
  6. USC – 307.5

SwimSwam Official Fan Guide Picks:

  1. California
  2. Stanford
  3. Arizona
  4. Arizona State
  5. USC
  6. Utah

2019 Final Results:

  1. California – 948
  2. Stanford – 716
  3. Arizona – 570
  4. Arizona State – 459.5
  5. USC – 366.5
  6. Utah – 335

Read the full story on SwimSwam: SwimSwam Voters Picks: Week 3 of Major 2020 NCAA Conference Championships

2020 Pro Swim Series – Des Moines: Top 5 Races to Watch

$
0
0

By Nick Pecoraro on SwimSwam

2020 Pro Swim Series – Des Moines

While NCAA/HS swimming is firing up with upcoming championships, the racing stakes are also going to be blazing in Des Moines for more Pro Swim Series action this week. With Olympic Trials now nearly 3 months away, here are the top 5 storylines to watch for round 3 of the 2020 Pro Swim Series in Des Moines.

Top Five Races to Watch – PSS Des Moines

#5: Women’s 100 Free: HKG’s Haughey V. USA’s Manuel

After losing to 2016 co-Olympic champion Penny Oleksiak of Canada in her 2020 debut, American Simone Manuel will now face another international sprint star, Hong Kong’s Siobhan Haughey. In Knoxville, Manuel placed second to Oleksiak in the 100 free. So far this season, Haughey’s season best (53.33) leads Manuel’s SB (53.44) by 0.11s in the world rankings.

At the 2019 World Championships, Haughey parlayed her success in the NCAA into the elite international scene with a 4th-place finish in the 200 free. She then became a sensation for the ISL’s DC Trident, going undefeated in the 200 SCM free.

#4: Women’s 200 Fly: Flickinger V. Smith Round 2

Olympian and World Championships runner-up Hali Flickinger and teen backstroke specialist Regan Smith are scheduled to face-off in the 200 fly this weekend. At the Knoxville PSS, Flickinger (2:08.34) edged out Smith (2:08.73) by half a second. While Smith’s season best hails from that Knoxville meet, Flickinger’s world #2 time of 2:07.65 was set at the US Open in December 2019.

Flickinger currently is the fastest American women this season in the 200 fly by a full second, with Worlds bronze medalist Katie Drabot (2:08.34) and Olivia Carter (2:08.58) filling in the next 2 US spots (neither will be at this meet as they prepare for the NCAA Championships). Smith is best known as a backstroker after breaking World Records in the 100 and 200 meter races, but is also the 4th-fastest flyer in the US this season. That, along with her 15-16 SCY NAG and 2019 US National title, are two solid accolades that give her a shot at making the Olympic team in the 200 fly too, if she chooses to swim it.

#3: Women’s 100 Breast Trials Preview: Lazor V. Hannis in the Race Behind King

Lilly King‘s season best of 1:05.65 in the 100 breaststroke currently is the only time in the World under 1:06 this season. She’s the defending Olympic Champion and two-time World Champion, and the World Record holder, poising her for another PSS title.

In the race for second, both this weekend in Des Moines as well as this summer in Omaha, will be 2020 World #4 Pan Ams medalist Annie Lazor and 2020 World #9 Olympian Molly Hannis.

At PSS Knoxville, Lazor took the win at 1:06.68, just 0.05s off her season best (1:06.63), without King. Meanwhile, ISL powerhouse Hannis’ season best of 1:06.98 puts her in tight contention for the battle for second.

However, at the upcoming Olympic Trials, only two women can represent the US in the 100 breast. Looking at last year’s PSS season, Lazor looks to be in the best position to accompany King in Tokyo. Hannis, on the other hand, earned her Olympic rings in 2016, but in the 200 race.

The top three US women in this event (King, Lazor, Hannis) are well-known for their strong finishes, making the US women’s 100 breast one of the most competitive events to keep an eye on in Omaha. Worlds medalist Bethany Galat (1:07.46) will also be a contender both in Des Moines and Omaha.

#2: Men’s 200 IM Trials Preview: Kalisz V. Lochte V. Andrew V. Dressel

It will be another clash of the titans, this time in the 200 IM, which projects to be one of the best races of this summer’s domestic schedule. Worlds medalist Chase Kalisz leads the sprint IM event with his 2020 World #5 time of 1:57.28 from the 2019 US Open. Kalisz has been quiet this LCM season after taking bronze in the 200 IM and missing the 400 IM final at the 2019 Worlds meet.

Coming in for the next fastest American in Des Moines is 4-time Olympian Ryan Lochte, sliding in for 11th in the world at 1:58.89. Lochte’s 2016-2020 Olympic quad has been an uphill, serving two suspensions that kept him from 2017 and 2018 competitions. However, Lochte kept his sights forward, achieving a redemptive 2019 US National title in the 200 IM.

While BR/IM specialist Josh Prenot and teen Carson Fosterwill not contest in the 200 IM in Des Moines, versatile sprint star Michael Andrew (SB 1:59.02) and FR/FL specialist Caeleb Dressel (SB/LTB 1:59.97) come in as the next top IM contenders. While Dressel’s season best just misses the World Top 25 (and won’t likely swim it at Trials), he still remains the fastest 200 IM SCY performer in history.

Previewing the race, Andrew and Dressel will take major advantage of early speed in the front half of the IM. As per usual, Kalisz should dramatically accelerate in the breaststroke leg and gain ground after the fly/back. However, because of Kalisz’s unique strategy to that of his other competitors makes him poised to take the title.

Dressel, who was an ISL skins star, can usually hold on for close finishes, setting himself up for a great race against Kalisz. Veteran Lochte, who has internationally raced this event since 2004, progressively builds speed throughout the race, with his back/breast legs being the most crucial for the 35-year-old. Andrew practically trains for the 200 IM with his versatile sprint training but still struggles with lactate control on the freestyle leg.

This will be a chance for some of the biggest names to respond to races over the weekend at other meets. Sam Stewart recently put up a 1:57.76 at the College Station Sectional meet on March 1st, ranking him 8th in the World, right behind US teen Foster (1:57.59). Foster, meanwhile, swam 1:58s on back-to-back nights while testing his Olympic Trials preparedness at a meet in Ohio.

#1: First 100 Back Match-Up of 2020: Smith V. Baker V. Smoliga

If you thought the women’s 100 breast will be competitive in Omaha, just wait until the 100 back. Des Moines’ lineup includes both 2016 Olympians in the event Olivia Smoliga and Kathleen Baker, along with the current world record-holder Regan Smith, who is only a teenager.

So far this season, Smith comes in as the top 100 backstroker in the world with her PSS record of 58.26 in Knoxville. At the 2019 US Open, however, Smith settled for second behind fellow teen Phoebe Bacon(58.63), who is not present in Des Moines. In the US rankings, Bacon is currently 2nd in the nation behind Smith.

The next fastest-American woman based on season ranks in Des Moines is Smoliga with her 59.60 season best from the 2019 US Open, her only LCM meet this season. When competing with the ISL’s Cali Condors, Smoliga has a lethal asset to the squad, setting herself up as a FR/BK sprint star in the league. During last year’s PSS season, Smoliga set her lifetime best with her then-PSS record of 58.73.

Kathleen Baker, on the other hand, has yet to break 1:00 this season, coming in at 1:00.03 in a meet in Nice, France earlier this year/ While in Nice, Baker blasted a World #3 time of 2:08.75 in the 200 IM, pointing towards a training focus away from backstroke. Baker’s lifetime best still remains at 58.00 (a former World Record), but she has not touched that time since 2018 US Nationals. Her season best from 2019 was just 59.03, which she swam at that year’s World championships.

200 meter specialist Lisa Bratton (1:00.22) and Team Elite’s Ali DeLoof (1:00.20) also come in with sub-1:00 entry times and 2020 top-25 World times.

Top Names to Watch – By Event

Top names were hand-selected based on seed time and 2019-2020 season performance thus far in each event to point out potential high-class races and individuals in Des Moines.

Men

  • 50 free: Dressel, Gkolomeev (GRE), Andrew, Apple, Adrian
  • 100 free: Dressel, Held, Apple, Pieroni, Farris, Adrian,
  • 200 Free: Haas, Seliskar, Pieroni, Farris, Apple, Conger
  • 400 Free: Grothe, D’Arrigo, Weiser, Sweetser, Wilimovsky
  • 800 Free: Grothe, Wilimovsky
  • 1500 Free: Wilimovsky, Grothe
  • 100 Back: Murphy, Grevers
  • 200 Back: Murphy, Pebley
  • 100 Breast: Wilson, Miller, Andrew
  • 200 Breast: Prenot, Wilson, Fink, Miller
  • 100 Fly: Dressel, Kusch (GER), Lanza (BRA), Martinez (GUA), Shields, Andrew
  • 200 Fly: Harting, Shields, Kalisz
  • 200 IM: Kalisz, Andrew, Lochte, Vazaios (GRE), Dressel
  • 400 IM: Litherland, DeVine, Bentz, Lochte

Women

  • 50 Free: Manuel, Geer, Wasick (POL), Comerford, Smoliga, Osman (EGY)
  • 100 Free: Manuel, Comerford, Haughey (HKG), Geer, Gastaldello (FRA)
  • 200 Free: Ledecky, Haughey (HKG), Schmitt, Manuel, McLaughlin
  • 400 Free: Ledecky, L. Smith, Meitz, Margalis, McHugh, Twichell, Schmitt
  • 800 Free: Ledecky, L. Smith, McHugh, Twichell
  • 1500 Free: Ledecky, Twichell, L. Smith
  • 100 Back: R. Smith, Baker, Smoliga, Bratton
  • 200 Back: R. Smith, Baker, Bratton
  • 100 Breast: King, Hannis, Lazor,
  • 200 Breast: Lazor, King, Galat
  • 100 Fly: Dahlia, McLaughlin, Kendall, Stewart
  • 200 Fly: Flickinger, R. Smith, Kingsley, McLaughlin
  • 200 IM: Margalis, Eastin, Cox, Andison (CAN), Sheridan (AUS)
  • 400 IM: McHugh, Margalis, L. Smith, Eastin

Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2020 Pro Swim Series – Des Moines: Top 5 Races to Watch

Scoring the 2020 NCAA Women’s D1 Pre-Selection Psych Sheets

$
0
0

By Braden Keith on SwimSwam

Data Compiled by Andrew Mering.

With Tuesday’s release of the pre-selection Women’s Division I NCAA Championship psych sheets, we were able to project where the cut-line will be drawn for invite to the national championship meet that runs March 18th-21st in Athens, Georgia.

That tells the story of who individually will earn invites to the meet (though there are likely to be a few scratches, including one we seem to know of already, to shift that picture in the next 2 weeks).

But this also allows us to start looking at the team scoring potential for the meet.

Sitting at the top of the projected team scoring, by a substantial margin, are the ACC Champion Virginia Cavaliers, followed closely by the SEC Champion Tennessee Volunteers. While Virginia has a ton of momentum, and incoming classes including swimmers like Alex and Gretchen Walsh, that left them destined to compete for national titles down the road, a title in the 2020 season would be ahead of schedule for what most expected from the Cavaliers.

The 3rd-place team is a bit of a surprise: the Cal Golden Bears. Cal definitely has a top-3 caliber roster at the NCAA Championships, so that bit is not surprising; rather, it’s that Cal is seeded so far ahead of Stanford, the three-time defending NCAA Champions. Stanford finished 373.5 points ahead of Cal at the Pac-12 Championships and won their dual meet over Cal by 89 points.

For perspective, last year Stanford led all teams in psych sheet scoring with 374 points: 3 ahead of Cal. While Stanford’s Pac-12 Championship margin was bigger last year (423 points), that they are seeded well back of Cal on paper is still surprising.

That’s one of several upended conference championship results projected. For example, the Big Ten runners-up from Michigan are projected to score more (233.5 points) than the Big Ten Champions from Ohio State (131 points).

These psych sheets don’t tell the full story of the NCAA Championship meet, although they are a reasonable starting point. There’s two other key pieces of information missing:

1. Diving – This scoring doesn’t include any diving points. Among the top teams, Stanford has the best diving squad – they scored 15 diving points at last year’s NCAA Championships, all of which return this season and all but 1 of which were scored by freshmen. That doesn’t even account for freshman Mia Paulsen, who was the Pac-12 Champion over the weekend on platform.

2. Performance – Everyone’s most (and least) favorite topic: tapers, rests, suits, illnesses, and who’s going to show up for the NCAA Championships. Most teams claim expectations of improvements from their regular season and conference meets to the NCAA Championships, but in practice very few teams accomplish it. Last year’s top-performing teams on seed-versus-actual swimming scoring were Louisville, Stanford, and Minnesota, while the worst-performing teams were Tennessee, Ohio State, and Texas.

Most Improved Teams, By Points, from Seed Scoring to Actual Scoring, 2020 NCAA Championships:

  1. Louisville +70.5
  2. Stanford +63.5
  3. Minnesota +50.5
  4. Cal +44.5
  5. (TIE) Duke/Virginia +41
  6. Arizona +37.5
  7. Michigan +19
  8. (TIE) Wisconsin/Penn State/Alabama +10

Most Dis-Improved Teams, By Points, from Seed Scoring to Actual Scoring, 2020 NCAA Championships:

  1. Tennessee -76
  2. NC State -55
  3. Auburn -51
  4. Florida -49.5
  5. Texas -31.5
  6. Georgia -28
  7. Indiana -25.5
  8. (TIE) UNC/Texas A&M -22
  9. USC -21.5

Of course even this doesn’t tell a complete picture. Some years, teams have different goals. Some years, teams get sick. Some teams have new coaches, and some of it is individually-based, with certain athletes handling the conference-nationals taper cycle better than others.

But the proof of that will come out in the pudding in March at the Gabrielsen Natatorium. Until then, all that’s left to do is argue.

Psych Sheet Scoring, 2020 NCAA Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships – Swimming Only

RankTeamSeeded Points
1Virginia-VA374
2Tennessee-SE304.5
3California-PC272
4NC State-NC247.5
5Michigan-MI233.5
6Georgia-GA217
7Stanford-PC193
8Southern Cali-CA176.5
9Kentucky-KY158.5
10Auburn-SE150
11Ohio St-OH131
12Alabama-SE130
13Florida-FL126
14Louisville-KY123
15Wisconsin-WI117
16Arizona St-AZ84
17Northwestern-IL83
18Missouri-MV79
19Texas-ST78
20Indiana-IN70
21Arkansas-AR49
22Duke-NC35.5
23UNC-NC22
24Harvard-NE19
25Texas A&M-GU14
26Minnesota-MN14
27San Diego St-SI13.5
28Princeton-NJ12
29Arizona-AZ7
30FGCU-FL7
31Florida St-FL6
32Hawaii-HI5
33South Carolina-SC5
34Houston-GU4
35Utah-UT3
36Penn St-MA1.5

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Scoring the 2020 NCAA Women’s D1 Pre-Selection Psych Sheets

Viewing all 81303 articles
Browse latest View live